⚠️ Enter at your own risk! This analysis delves into the details of the dystopian plot. If you continue, be aware of spoilers that lurk in wait for you…
Introduction: A Journey Through Dystopia
Simon Stålenhag’s The Electric State paints a haunting vision of a retro-futuristic America on the brink of collapse. The original book, more of a visual narrative than a conventional novel, immerses readers in melancholic landscapes littered with towering war machines and the remnants of a society that has succumbed to its own technological addiction. Now, with the Russo Brothers’ adaptation streaming on Netflix, the pressing question emerges: Does the film faithfully preserve the book’s dark essence, or does it water down its grim themes for mainstream appeal?
As The Electric State reaches audiences worldwide, this article explores the key differences between the book and the movie, analyzing how the adaptation translates the eerie, thought-provoking world of Stålenhagen into cinematic form. We’ll delve into the visual aesthetic, thematic shifts, and whether the film manages to retain the book’s sharp dystopian critique or veers towards a more palatable adventure.
For those seeking a deeper dive into these themes, we provide links to premium articles that offer extensive analysis of the film’s underlying philosophy, its approach to nostalgia and escapism, and how it compares to other dystopian classics like Blade Runner 2049 and The Hunger Games.
Book vs. Film: What to Expect?
1. The Tone: A Shift from Isolation to Action
In The Electric State, the book’s protagonist, Michelle, wanders a desolate America with only her robot companion for company, navigating a ghost world devoid of human interaction. The novel’s silent, introspective tone fosters an overwhelming sense of solitude and despair.
Conversely, the Russo Brothers introduce new characters to provide more interactions and emotional connections, notably Keats (Chris Pratt) and his own robotic sidekick. This significantly shifts the tone from an existential road trip into a more conventional adventure film, emphasizing camaraderie over isolation.
While the book’s eerie silence is filled with unspoken loss, the film compensates with dialogue-heavy scenes, trading the novel’s quiet sorrow for character-driven drama. This is not necessarily a flaw—but it does mark a clear departure from Stålenhag’s original vision.

2. Thematic Integrity: Retaining or Diluting the Dystopia?
One of the most powerful aspects of The Electric State is its bleak critique of technological dependence. The “Neurocaster” system, a VR device originally used for war but later repurposed for consumer escapism, becomes a form of mass sedation, rendering people into comatose husks. It is a nightmarish allegory for digital addiction, social alienation, and the erasure of personal agency.
The film, however, softens this theme considerably. While the Neurocaster remains present, its impact is somewhat relegated to a subplot rather than the book’s dominant specter. Instead, the movie foregrounds a more tangible external conflict, with a clear antagonist in Colonel Lawrence (Giancarlo Esposito). By making the dangers of the world more explicit and physical, the adaptation shifts the tension from internal existential dread to outward survival.
This change invites the question: Is The Electric State still a dystopian warning, or has it become an action-packed hero’s journey?
3. The Nostalgia Factor: Aesthetics vs. Critique
Stålenhag’s The Electric State is drenched in nostalgia, not as a means of comfort but as a tool of critique. Set in an alternate 1990s America, the book plays with the eerie juxtaposition of childhood innocence and looming catastrophe. The book’s landscapes are filled with the skeletal remains of shopping malls, abandoned highways, and obsolete technology, reinforcing the idea that progress has stalled—or even reversed.
The Russo Brothers stay faithful to this aesthetic, infusing the film with a 90s-inspired visual language. However, the nostalgia seems to serve a different purpose. Instead of critiquing our contemporary longing for the past, it appears to embrace it, making the film more of a sentimental homage than a cautionary tale. This follows a broader trend in Hollywood, where nostalgic settings (like those in Stranger Things or Fallout) often evoke a sense of longing rather than an examination of societal decay.

Preserving the Dystopian Core?
Comparison to Other Dystopian Films
The transition from book to film is always an act of interpretation, and The Electric State is no exception. When compared to other dystopian adaptations, its approach is worth analyzing:
- Blade Runner 2049: Maintained a deep, philosophical tone, prioritizing existential themes over action, though at the expense of mainstream box-office success.
- The Hunger Games: Turned a dark political narrative into a thrilling adventure, balancing dystopian elements with blockbuster appeal.
- Children of Men: Managed to blend action with profound social critique, making its dystopian warning feel visceral and urgent.
Where does The Electric State land? While it attempts to make its dystopian world more accessible in a Hunger Games-like fashion, it ultimately fails to capture the same level of bleakness. Unlike The Hunger Games, which successfully balances mainstream appeal with a strong dystopian message, The Electric State struggles to convey the overwhelming despair of the book or even the tension of other dystopian adaptations. Instead, it softens its darker themes, making the world feel less oppressive and more like a stylized adventure, diminishing the emotional weight that made the novel so haunting.
A Hopeful Ending?
The book ends on a deeply melancholic note, embracing the inevitability of decline. The film, however, introduces a more hopeful resolution, which is common in Hollywood adaptations. This change reshapes the core message: where the book suggests that the world has irreversibly collapsed, the film implies that redemption remains possible.
Final Verdict: Dystopian Cautionary Tale or Entertaining Blockbuster?
So, has The Electric State stayed true to its dystopian roots? The answer is complex. While it retains the core aesthetic and broad themes of Stålenhag’s world, it reshapes them into a more digestible narrative. The result is a visually stunning, emotionally engaging adventure that is perhaps less intellectually demanding than its source material but more widely accessible.
For viewers seeking a pure, unfiltered dystopian experience, the book remains essential. The film, on the other hand, serves as an entry point—one that may inspire audiences to reflect on the dangers of unchecked technological advancement, but in a way that is more thrilling than terrifying.
For an in-depth breakdown of The Electric State and its dystopian significance, check out our premium articles coming soon:
- For Free: “The Electric State – A Modern Dystopia Reflecting the Realities of 2025“
- “From AI Warning to Hollywood Action – Does The Electric State Dilute Its Message?”
- “Nostalgia and Escapism in Dystopia – What The Electric State Tells Us About Our Reality”
- “Dystopia on Screen – How The Electric State Compares to Blade Runner 2049 and The Hunger Games“